we really only need it there, because the context is
for release archives. normal use of the git repository
doesn't matter in the context of deletions, because that
will not be distributed. only the result of ./mk release
will be distributed.
the builds produced will not change as a result of this,
for people using the normal git repository, because the
files in question are never used anyway, in our configs.
this is being done to make working on local repos easier.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
otherwise, ./mk -b (without argument) will fail, on release
archives. also, perhaps i should add an mkhelper to build it?
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
The result of the printf statement is sorted, making
it do binaries first, which results in a lot of junk
files then being present inside the source archive.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
don't move to the real directory until the work
is done.
that way, a re-try can be done, while analysing
the old files. it is created based on the tmpdir,
under XBMK_CACHE/
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
We don't need to call it from git.sh, because it's
only being done when building a release anyway,
and we already run rmgit when doing a release.
The function itself is only two simple fx_ calls,
so we can just do that from build_release().
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
many places in lbmk used err, because older versions
of x_ did not handle globbing properly.
however, use of x_ is preferable on trivial commands.
the only time err() should be called is what it has
to be, when x_ can't work, or when a more useful error
message is needed, for context.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
The idea with mk is that it's meant to basically be a
stub for running everything else, while mainly having
the trees logic within it (what was once script/trees).
Signed-off-by: Leah Rowe <leah@libreboot.org>
Leah Rowe